[Versa] Versa issue: drawing the line on entailments
Michael Olson
Mike.Olson at fourthought.com
Sun Aug 28 23:07:33 MDT 2005
My opinion on this is that Versa should not require any entailment
beyond simple entailment. Then, whenever the spec bumps into
entailment issues we differ to the model.
There will be exceptions. One example is in the traverse function, if
you specify the transitive option then the implementation would be
required to simulate support for entailment related to
owl:TransitiveProperty.
Mike
On Aug 12, 2005, at 6:26 PM, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> http://lists.fourthought.com/pipermail/ril/2004-September/000354.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
Mike Olson Principal
Consultant
mike.olson at fourthought.com +1 720 253 4662
Fourthought, Inc.
http://Fourthought.com
PO Box 270590, http://4Suite.org
Louisville, CO 80027-5009, USA
XML strategy, XML tools, knowledge management
More information about the Versa
mailing list