[Versa] Issue 100A proposal, extension functions

[Uche Ogbuji]

On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 11:59 -0600, Michael Olson wrote:
> >> All function names are Qnames as given by 'Namespaces in XML.'
> >> Qnames are all expanded the same way by the implementation.
> >> References to unbound namespace prefixes should always raise the same
> >> error (for variables, node queries, and function names) indicating to
> >> the user that the prefix used is unbound.
> >>
> >> The following namespaces prefix to URI bindings should be registered  
> >> by default:
> >>
> >> rdfs    http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
> >> rdf     http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
> >> dc      http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
> >> xs      http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
> >> owl    http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
> >> vtrav  http://rdfinference.org/versa/0/2/traverse/
> >> versa http://rdfinference.org/versa/0/2/
> >
> > I think we should eliminate vtrav and all other derived Versa
> > namespaces, and just use the main Versa namespace.
> >
> 
> Agreed.  May be
> 
> http://versardf.org/ns/2/0/constants
> 
> as on place for all of them?

Sure.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net                    http://fourthought.com
http://copia.ogbuji.net                   http://4Suite.org
Use CSS to display XML, part 2 - http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/x-dw-x-xmlcss2-i.html
XML Output with 4Suite & Amara - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/04/20/py-xml.html
Use XSLT to prepare XML for import into OpenOffice Calc - http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-oocalc/
Schema standardization for top-down semantic transparency - http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think31.html