[Versa] Versa doc

Jeremy Kloth jeremy.kloth at fourthought.com
Mon Sep 19 12:56:16 MDT 2005


On Monday 19 September 2005 9:18 am, Michael Olson wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2005, at 8:29 AM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> >> Well, no-brainer the second one looks a huge amount better.  I think
> >> the
> >> harder question is whether or not we should include the Versa spec in
> >> 4Suite at all.  We'd discussed a separate CVS area for Versa, and I
> >> presume a separate distribution.
> >
> > I think the Versa spec should have it's own area seperate from 4Suite.
> >  A seperate CVS area, and perhaps it's own sourceforge project (though
> > I'm less certain about this than just a seperate CVS location).  It
> > will help simplify the 4Suite documentation effort (especially the
> > section on RDF) for one thing.
>
> It is.  Its top level Versa (internal CVS).  Just a note though, I have
> a lot of changes to the spec not checked in.  I'll work on checking
> these in today and then I'll focus on updating to the new stylesheet.
>
> Jeremy, did you make the conversions by hand or do have a stylesheet to
> make the changes?

I did them by hand as they weren't too severe, as only a handful of tags are 
used that are not supported by sdoc.  I also did a few fixups while I was in 
there.

Attached is the diff of the changes I made.

-- 
Jeremy Kloth
Fourthought, Inc.
http://fourthought.com/
http://4suite.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: versa-sdocbook.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 69863 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fourthought.com/pipermail/versa/attachments/20050919/1b92c8f0/versa-sdocbook-0001.bin


More information about the Versa mailing list