[Versa] Grammar TODO list

Michael Olson Mike.Olson at fourthought.com
Mon Sep 26 13:08:43 MDT 2005


Based on todays discussions here is what I see as changes that need to  
be made to the grammar.

1)  possibly some renaming, and simplification of symbols
2)  split the grammars.  What is a good name for the binding language?   
I think it should live in "Versa" CVS for now regardless of the name.
3)  We accept the "==".
4)  With the grammars split, I'm fine with "@" for a function  
reference.  If there are no objections this needs to be updated
5)  Add precedence to bgen to solve the "-" issues and revert back to  
"all() - rdf:type -> *" for traversal (working on this now)


Mike



------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
-----------------
Mike Olson                                                Principal  
Consultant
mike.olson at fourthought.com                +1 720 253 4662
Fourthought, Inc.                                       
http://Fourthought.com
PO Box 270590,                                       http://4Suite.org
Louisville, CO 80027-5009, USA
XML strategy, XML tools, knowledge management



More information about the Versa mailing list