[Versa] Grammar TODO list
Michael Olson
Mike.Olson at fourthought.com
Mon Sep 26 13:08:43 MDT 2005
Based on todays discussions here is what I see as changes that need to
be made to the grammar.
1) possibly some renaming, and simplification of symbols
2) split the grammars. What is a good name for the binding language?
I think it should live in "Versa" CVS for now regardless of the name.
3) We accept the "==".
4) With the grammars split, I'm fine with "@" for a function
reference. If there are no objections this needs to be updated
5) Add precedence to bgen to solve the "-" issues and revert back to
"all() - rdf:type -> *" for traversal (working on this now)
Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
Mike Olson Principal
Consultant
mike.olson at fourthought.com +1 720 253 4662
Fourthought, Inc.
http://Fourthought.com
PO Box 270590, http://4Suite.org
Louisville, CO 80027-5009, USA
XML strategy, XML tools, knowledge management
More information about the Versa
mailing list