[Xpath-ng] xpath-ng requirements

[Jeni Tennison]

Uche wrote:
> Yes. As I mentioned in my last message, I think we should quickly
> establish a process for formal decisions. This means there has to be
> a person or persons with final say. I think that with this authority
> should come responsibility. i.e. those with such authority should be
> prepared to conscientiously contribute to and and promote the XPath
> NG project.
>
> I would nominate myself in such a role, and I would also nominate
> Jeni (assuming she didn't mind the responsibility).

I'd be happy to.

> I do think we should have more than one person with final say,
> though an odd number to minimize deadlock. I think 3 is a good
> number.

Agreed. Anyone else want to step up to the plate (as I believe the
Americans would say)?

> These are just my ideas. Most importantly, I want to proceed on any
> basis that keeps people as motivated as they have been to
> participate, but minimizes conflict and diffusion.

Agreed.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/