[Xpath-ng] Thoughts on work products

[Uche Ogbuji]

> As for XSLT NG, it rather depends on how XSLT 2.0 defines its
> relationship with XPath 2.0. At the moment it looks like XSLT 2.0 will
> insist on XPath 2.0. In addition, some XSLT 2.0 constructs might be
> described differently with XPath NG (e.g. if XPath NG allowed
> sequences-within-sequences then the grouping facility in XSLT 2.0
> could be described in a different way). My guess would be that XSLT NG
> could be defined as XSLT 1.0 plus extension elements/attributes that
> mirror some XSLT 1.0 elements/attributes.
> 
> I don't know how others feel?

<aol>You said pretty much *exactly* what I had in mind (except for the neat 
idea about grouping, which I find exciting).</aol>


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Python&XML column: 2. Introducing PyXML - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/09/25/py.html
The Past, Present and Future of Web Services 1 - http://www.webservices.org/index.php/article/articleview/663/1/24/
The Past, Present and Future of Web Services 2 - 'http://www.webservices.org/index.php/article/articleview/679/1/24/
Serenity through markup - http://adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6807
Tip: Using generators for XML processing - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-tipgenr.html